"Look at me! You can do it now, let's go baby"
ide ini saya buat pas semester V kalo gak salah ada kontroversi pas waktu itu... Inul waktu itu yang jadi top news nya. dan kami bikin selebaran mengenai hal ini (krisis aktualisasi ceritanya) dan , sayang di tolak di salah satu perguruan tinggi terkenal di surabaya oleh salah satu organisasi internal kampus tersebut karena terlalu "berat."langsung aja!.
seharusnya ada hukum keilmuan yang mengatur tentang persepsi. tentu jika persespsi itu sama maka dengan mudah dapat ditetapkanya sbuah hukum/aturan yang ajeg.
banyak kasus/artis yang mengatakan "itukan menurut persepsi masyarakat". pada akhirnya pihak pelapor atau bahkan pengadilan tidak bisa memutuskan perkara. meskipun ada alternatif yang merepotkan dengan melakukan penelitian itupun belum ngomong standradisasi penelitian atau apa kek!. diluar itu terjadi perpecahan antara mereka yang tidak suka, suka, dan menyimpulkan tidak suka/suka (mass media) dengan mengatas namakan masyarakat. sedangkan tradisi, budaya, pola pikir, dll masyarakat belum/tidak bisa ditemukan keterwakilannya dalam mempersepsi.
mungkin ini akan dijadikan sebuah alat ukur dan membutuhkan penelitian lebih lanjut tentuynya, mengenai "apa itu (persepsi masyarakat) suara, lagu, gambar, gambar bergerak, yang bersifat pornografi": langsung aja!
secara teori (psikologi kognitif) :
jogetan kontrofersial
coba kalo dipisahkan antara jogetan dengan lagunya. dan lagunya diganti lagu pop.
lagu kontrofersial
coba lihat gambar pemandangan alam sambil mendengarkan lagu.
gak adil donk!
yahhhhhhhhh......... silhakan anda membaliknya.
jogetan yang dianggap gak seronok (pop) dengan diiringin lagu dangdut. dan seterusnya...
meskipn terlihat aneh! tapi bukankah semua orang bisa merecall kembali dan bisa membedakan (mengkotakkan) antara kedua unsur yang berbeda. tentu tidak menemukan "match" persepsi, tapi setidaknya apa yang ditangkap mengenai lagu/joget,dll kontrofersial itu bisa jelas.
selamat mencoba dan menikmati!.
______________________________________________________________________
perception code (law)
his idea is I make snugly smester of wrong V kalo caw there is controversy snugly at that time... Inul at that time which become the its top news. and we make the handout of concerning this matter ( its actulisation crisis story) and , Ohhh... in refusing in one of famous college in surabaya by one of internal organization of the campus because too " just heavy!.
ought to there is punish the science arranging about perception. of course if that persespsi is of equal hence easily can specify of a law/order which snugly
a lot of case / artist telling " that of according to society perception". in the end side the rapporteur or even justice cannot verdict. though there is disturbing alternative by conducting that research even also not yet to talk standardize research or what!.is out of it happened by the dissolution of among/between those who do not like, like, and conclude do not like / like the (mass media) by for naming society. while tradition, cultural, patterned thinking, dll society not yet / cannot be found by delegation in perception.
possible this will be made by a measuring instrument and require the furthermore research perhaps, hitting " what that ( society perception) voice, song, draw the, picture make a move, having the character of pornography": direct of!
theoretically ( cognate psychology ):
jogetan (dance) controversy
try the if dissociated by between jogetan with its song. and its song is changed by the pop song
song controversy
try to see the experienced view picture at the same time listen the song
clear of fair caw!
yahhhhhhhhh......... your going return it.
jogetan assumed do not porno ( pop) by accompanied is song dangdut. and so on though seen bizzare! but isn't it true that everybody can merecall return and can differentiate the (box) of between second of different element. of course do not find the " match" perception, but at least what be under arrest hit the song / that joget,dll kontrovercial can be clear
safe to try and enjoy!.
