Andai ada 1000 polisi seperti ini, yang setiap jamnya liwat depan mata.
Selain aman juga ayemmmm...
"pageee... mbak!"
Nama : (masih) Bripda "X"
Rumah: ASPOL "X" (Rumdins Ayahnya)
Usia : 22th
sebenarnya banyak, tapi baru kali ini kami mendalaminya bagaimana pola pikir sebenarnya yang terjadi, meskipun hanya observasi biasa dan gak ilmiah-ilmiah amat (subjektif), yang kami dapat:
1. loyalitas yang tinggi. gak tahu jenis pencucian otak seperti apa yang terjadi atau mungkin karena jaminan sebagai manusia sudah lengkap, bilamana kita mengarah pada suatu paradigma "manusia tentunya memiliki pilihan (sikap) atas hidupnya". artinya diluar itu kita dalam budaya demokrasi biasa dan terbiasa mempertahankan nilai-nilai ideologi kita dengan mempertahankan pemimpin (sebagai wakil dan syarat ideologi) meskipun pada umumnya tidak cukup layak untuk kita. sedangkan polisi? apapun ideologinya tetep aja manut/"nurut" kecuali makar. dalam sejarahnya dulu kita emang fokus tapi sekarang dan akan datang kita tidak tahu. bisa jadi ini kekuatan diluar gonjang-ganjing perpolitikan yang patut diperhitungkan meskipun zaman sekarang lumayan lahhh... inklusif. sepertinya disini saya juga memandang sistem kemiliteran ideal adalah mengikutsertakan rakyatnya. coba kita belajar dari yunani dengan pemikirannya & kesuburannya dan romawi dengan tentaranya & lahan keringnya. bisa jadi negara-negara saat ini memang lagi sedang sakit/mempersiapkan peseakitan bagi negara-negara lain. tentu tidak terjadi pada kepolisian tentunya.
2. jalan berfikir yang terlihat sederhana, pasti dan tegas. kami mensinyalir karena jaminan hukum yang pasti dan pemenuhan kebutuhan yang cukup (dengan pekerjaan yang menurut kami, kurang begitu membuang pikiran, kami tidak menyebutnya kurang pandai). mereka melihat permasalahan dengan penangkapan variabel yang jelas /kongkrit dan percaya diri. diluar itu kami dan mungkin masyarakat sekitar terlalu paranoid memahami permasalahan yang ada dan terjadi.
3. ada perilaku post power syndrom dimana dia mengajukan dirinya dan institusinya untuk merahi perhatian. im/explisit, postur yang terkesan "ditegakkan,"arah pembicaraan yang mengerah pada pengetahuan kepolisian (jumlah cabang ganja, dll).
4. agresifitas (no comment) dalam hal ini kami memandang tergantung cara "repress" dan tradisi dari permasalahan yang terjadi pada mereka.
5. ada beberapa kata yang ditekankan, yang terkesan "belajar" mengobservasi.
semua ini hanya sebatas observasi (kualititatif) yang memang subjektif!.
"sekali-kali masyarakat jadi intelegen atas intelegen kepolisianya".
sekedar pengen tahu... he9x
______________________________________________________________________
have Police friends
its story is we have the Police friends...
Name : ( masih) Bripda " X"
House: ASPOL " X" ( its Rumdins hes Father)
Age : 22th
in fact a lot of, but this newly we deepen it how patterned thinking in fact that happened, though only ordinary observation and erudite caw very (subjektive), what we earn the
1. high loyalitas. caw know the type of brain wash of like what is going on or probably because guarantee as human being have complete, when we instruct at one particular paradigm " human being perhaps own the choice (attidute) for its life". its meaning out of it we are in ordinary democracy culture and accustomed maintain the our ideology values by maintaining leader (as proxy and ideology condition) though generally competent insufficient to we are. while police? any is its ideology is still obedient / " nurut" except coup d'etat military. in history first we course focus but now and will come the us do not know. it is possible that this strength of outside proper political distortion. reckoned though fair to middling the present day ... inklusif. likely here I also look into the ideal military system is involve its people. try the us learn from yunani with its opinion & its fertility and romawi militaryly his& its dry farming. it is possible that nations in this time it is true again ill medium / drawing up peseakitan for other;dissimilar nations. of course is not became of by the police perhaps
2. walke the thinks seen modestly, surely and coherent. we mensinyalir of because definitive law guarantee and requirement accomplishment which enough ( with the work which is according to us, less so throw away the mind, we do not mention it less be clever).they see the problems with the clear variable arrest / concrete and self confidence. out of it we and possible society of about too paranoia comprehend the existing problems and happened
3. there is behavioral of post power syndrom of where he raise the x'self and its institution for the merahi of attention. im / explisit, postur impressing " ditegakkan," discussion of focus conscripting at police knowledge (sum up the cannabis branch, etc).
4. agresifitas ( no comment) in this case we look into depended " repress" from problems that happened in them
5. there are some emphasized word, impressing " learn the" observation
all this only limited to observation ( kualititative) which it is true subjektive.
" occasionally society become the intelegen for he police intelegen
like simply! people want to know... he9x.
who you pacify
if your state ideology is wrong during the time!.
which nationalism? don't each;every there is leader don't know right ekstrem/ or do not and want that integration is nationalism.
what is nationalism and leadership?
you don't do not know the nationalism
if your leader is different with your ideology!.
one who you hold first time is leader
/ your superior.
don't blame the us of if possibility of coup d'etat always there is.
this non status quo problems. this is your problem is part of us, Indonesia people.
